anthropicclaudepricingcomparison

Claude API Pricing 2026: Every Model, Every Tier Explained

Complete guide to Anthropic Claude API pricing — Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku tiers, prompt caching discounts, and how Claude compares to GPT-4o at scale.

TTokenCost Editorial·LLM Cost Research·Updated 2026-04-286 min read

Anthropic's Claude family covers three tiers — Opus (frontier), Sonnet (balanced), and Haiku (fast/cheap) — with distinct pricing at each level. All Claude 4 and Claude 3.5 models support prompt caching, which can reduce input costs by up to 90%. This guide covers every Claude model, their pricing, and how they compare to OpenAI.

All Claude Models — Pricing Table

ModelInput /1MCached /1MOutput /1MContext
Claude Fable 5$10$1$501M
Claude Opus 4.8$5$0.5$251M
Claude Opus 4.7$5$0.5$251M
Claude Sonnet 4.6$3$0.3$151M
Claude Opus 4.6$5$251M
Claude Opus 4.5$15$1.5$75200k
Claude Haiku 4.5$1$0.1$5200k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3$0.3$15200k
Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.8$0.08$4200k
Claude 3 Opus$15$1.5$75200k

Claude 4 vs Claude 3.5: What Changed?

Claude 4 (Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.6, Opus 4.5, Haiku 4.5) represents Anthropic's latest generation with improved reasoning, longer context handling, and better instruction following. All Claude 4 models support extended thinking (similar to OpenAI o3) for complex reasoning tasks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 3.5 Haiku remain excellent for cost-sensitive workloads and have proven reliability in production.

Claude Opus vs Sonnet vs Haiku: Cost Comparison

At 10,000 requests/day (2,000 input + 1,000 output tokens):

Claude Opus 4.7
$10500/mo
$5 in · $25 out /1M
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$6300/mo
$3 in · $15 out /1M
Claude Haiku 4.5
$2100/mo
$1 in · $5 out /1M

When to Use Each Tier

Claude Haiku 4.5
High-volume, cost-sensitive tasks
Customer support, classification, simple Q&A, chatbots
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Most production use cases
Complex reasoning, coding, analysis, content generation — best balance
Claude Opus 4.7
Maximum capability tasks
Autonomous agents, complex coding, research, frontier reasoning

Claude vs GPT-4o: Price Comparison

ModelInput /1MOutput /1MCaching
Claude Sonnet 4.6$3$15$0.3/1M
Claude Haiku 4.5$1$5$0.1/1M
GPT-4o$2.5$10$1.25/1M
GPT-4.1$2$8$1/1M

Prompt Caching: Claude's Cost Advantage

All Claude models support prompt caching — and Anthropic offers the most aggressive caching discounts in the industry. If your prompts contain a large, repeated prefix (system prompt, few-shot examples, RAG context), caching can reduce your effective input cost by 50–90%.

Example: Claude Haiku 4.5 with 80% cache hit rate
Without caching
$1/1M input
Effective rate (80% cache)
$0.280/1M effective

View full Claude pricing: Anthropic API pricing → | Claude Sonnet vs GPT-4o →

Related Articles

Cheapest LLM API in 2026: Full Price Comparison
We compared 26 LLM models across 8 providers to find the cheapest API for every use case — from bulk processing to complex reasoning.
8 min read
GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Pricing & Performance in 2026
A detailed comparison of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google's pricing models, context windows, and value for different workloads.
7 min read
DeepSeek API Pricing Guide 2026: R1 vs Chat
How DeepSeek R1 and Chat pricing compares to GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet — and when it makes sense to switch for your workload.
5 min read